Agenda item

To receive petitions and public questions in accordance with Procedure Rule 20.

Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube.

1. Question from Rob Archer

The Mayor invited Rob Archer to ask a question as set out below:

“It is becoming increasingly difficult to find an appropriate cycle parking spot in Lynn town centre as provision of cycle parking has not kept up with the growth in cycling. Indeed, a significant number of parking hoops have been removed in recent years, particularly on the Tuesday Market Place and the Purfleet. Many others are damaged or in poor condition. The new racks at the library are very welcome but we need more throughout the town. 

The proposed ‘Active Travel Hub’ at Baker Lane (now refused planning permission) would have been of little use as it is awkward to cycle to and the design meant that around half the spaces would have been unusable. The cancellation of this project and the similar flawed scheme in South Lynn would release considerable funds to redress the situation, possibly with a more functional covered cycle parking area located near the bus or rail stations, along with a significant increase in parking spaces throughout the town centre. 

I note that the borough council has a ‘Car Parking Strategy’. Would it not be sensible to make this a more holistic ‘Parking Strategy’ and include cycle     parking as a clear part of the parking mix? This would enable more strategic   planning as to locations and the level of provision, as well as managing and facilitating a modal shift from driving to cycling.”

Councillor Beales responded by emphasising the importance of cycling provision within the borough. He explained that extensive discussions had taken place with cycling user groups regarding the Lynnsport development, and as part of that project all cycle routes had been resurfaced and upgraded, including the Sustrans crossings into the new estates. He also referred to the proposed new cycle facilities at the Guildhall.

Councillor Beales highlighted that the Town Deal proposals included alterations to the gyratory system and the introduction of several additional cycle paths. He expressed disappointment at the comments made regarding the Baker Lane scheme, noting that it remained an important project for the town. He clarified that the scheme had not been cancelled; rather, the applicant had received a planning refusal, and options for the next steps were now being considered. He further expressed disappointment that the Planning Committee had not supported the application and encouraged Mr Archer to take an active role in shaping the future of the Baker Lane proposals, including contributing views on facilities such as showers and changing areas.

Addressing Mr Archer’s comments on the Car Parking Strategy, Councillor Beales acknowledged that cycle parking should form part of that work and confirmed his willingness to engage with local cycling groups on the matter.

In his supplementary question, Mr Archer thanked Councillor Beales for his response and enthusiasm. He drew attention to the South Lynn Hub, noting that similar issues had arisen there as with Baker Lane. He reiterated his desire to be involved in future discussions and stressed the importance of incorporating the views of cycle users at an early stage. He expressed particular interest in the STARS scheme and encouraged early engagement with relevant groups.

Councillor Beales concluded by noting that the Planning Committee had shared many of Mr Archer’s concerns.  It was acknowledged that STARS had almost been finalised, making it challenging to revisit certain elements at this stage. However, the good working relationship with Norfolk County Council meant all parties would continue to work together.

2. Question from Alison Gifford

"May I ask the Mayor whether, now the new library building is open and there is a design prepared to enhance Baxter’s Plain and adjacent streets with funding for this apparently secured through the STARS programme, what   action the Council will take to bring the derelict post office building back into use?

This area remains blighted by this building which is visibly deteriorating with every month that passes. A scheme was granted planning permission in 2022,   and very minor (internal) works were undertaken last year to keep the consent alive, but there is no evidence that the developer has any real intention to take these plans forward.

This is a fine historic building.  It should be providing good quality housing at the heart of the town as agreed with the approved plans. If left to decline it will continue to mitigate any benefit of the new and proposed regeneration works – and we fear, become impossible to renovate viably.

What do BCKLWN intend to do ensure the developer proceeds with the work in a timely manner?”

Councillor Ring responded to the question stating that it was good to see so many people using the new library and acknowledged that the Post Office was a blight in the area.  Councillor Ring provided an update on contact with the owner and potential plans for retail and housing and stated that the Council would be willing to assist where possible to bring the building back into use.  Councillor Ring emphasises that the old post office was a key piece in the regeneration of Baxter’s Plain and its restoration was important.

Alison Gifford did not have a supplementary question but stated she hoped that the building would be brought back into use.