Minutes:
Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube.
The Chair of the Transport Informal Working Group, Councillor Bearshaw, presented the report as included in the Agenda, outlining the topics discussed at the Informal Working Group Meetings. He thanked officers and Members for their input. He noted recommendation two within the report, which was to disband the Informal Working Group, and suggested that the Panel may wish to pause the work of the Group until there were further matters to consider, such as the new Local Plan.
The Chair thanked Members and officers for the report and invited questions and comments from the Panel, as summarised below.
Councillor Blunt, who was a Member of the Informal Working Group, commented that the Group should remain established as there was still more work to do, including consideration of the Car Parking Strategy.
Councillor Collingham agreed with the recommendations put forward by the Informal Working Group, but felt that affordability and funding could be a stumbling block.
In response to a question from Councillor Collingham, Councillor Bearshaw explained that the Informal Working Group had discussed railway stations and potential locations and worked with Norfolk County Council to link these through to the Norfolk Rail Prospectus.
The Chair requested that officers include Councillors in any relevant forthcoming meetings with Norfolk County Council that would provide the opportunity to influence and shape transport and infrastructure in West Norfolk. The Regeneration Programmes Manager confirmed that she would liaise with Norfolk County Council.
The Regeneration Programmes Manager highlighted the valuable work carried out by the Informal Working Group and explained that their comments and recommendations would be fed into the draft Transport Strategy and other relevant emerging policies and strategies.
The Assistant Director reiterated the value of the work carried out by the Group and stated that Norfolk County Council had attended most of the meetings, found them useful and welcomed the opportunity to get views from the Group which would be used to inform policy and strategy as appropriate.
Councillor Kemp, who was a Member of the Informal Working Group, addressed the Panel and stated that it would be difficult to get additional railway provision until the upgrades to the Ely Junction had been completed due to increased journey times.
Councillor Kemp also made reference to the recommendations put forward relating to the Ferry, which stated that the recommendations included in the consultants report were unfeasible. Councillor Kemp stated that the recommendations needed to support this important commuter route and ensure it was fully accessible.
Councillor Everett addressed the Panel under Standing Order 34 and stated that he attended the Norfolk County Council Rail Group and would push for King’s Lynn to be included in the Prospectus. He commented that the Ely Junction upgrade should not impact a railway station in King’s Lynn and explained that there was central government funding available.
The Chair congratulated all those involved in the Informal Working Group including officers, Members and officers from Norfolk County Council. He agreed with earlier comments relating to keeping the Informal Working Group established so that they could meet in future once the recommendations from the Panel had been considered by Cabinet.
Councillor Ratcliffe proposed a slight amendment to the wording of the recommendations relating to Downham Market Railway Station and the increase of car parking provision, stating that any associated walkways from additional car parking to the station would need to be improved if required. Councillor Crofts suggested an area in Downham Market that could be used and Councillor Bearshaw explained that the Informal Working Group had considered several locations and passed their comments onto officers.
Councillor Collingham asked for clarification on the points raised by Councillor Kemp relating to the Ferry. Councillor Bearshaw explained that the Informal Working Group discussed a variety of options and acknowledged that the Ferry was an important facility. The Regeneration Programmes Manager explained that feasibility work on access improvements to the Ferry was ongoing and the recommendations from the WSP report would be reviewed. She also reminded the Panel that the King’s Lynn Masterplan included the West Lynn side of the Ferry.
Councillor Kemp addressed the Panel under Standing Order 34 and asked the Panel to consider amending the recommendations relating to the Ferry.
Councillor Ratcliffe commented that she had read the consultants report and stated that it included lots of caveats and work that required more investigation, and did not provide a full solution.
The Chair reminded the Panel that they received weekly updates on the Ferry and could request updates be brought to the Panel as appropriate.
RESOLVED: 1. That the Regeneration and Development Panel support the Informal Working Group’s recommendations for onward consideration by Cabinet, as set out below, with the minor amendment relating to Downham Market Railway car parking.
2. That the work of the Informal Working Group be put on pause until Cabinet had considered the initial set of recommendations from the Group, with future meetings to be arranged as and when required.
Recommendations relating to Rail
Recommendations relating to the Ferry
Recommendations relating to Travel/Cycling.
Recommendations relating to Buses
Supporting documents: