Venue: Assembly Room, Town Hall, Saturday Market Place, King's Lynn
Contact: Sam Winter, Democratic Services Manager 01553 616327
Link: View Live Stream
No. | Item |
---|---|
MINUTES To approve the Minutes of the previous meeting.
Decision: RESOLVED: The Minutes of the meeting held on 11 January 2022 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
RESOLVED: The Minutes of the meeting held on 11 January 2022 were agreed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|
URGENT BUSINESS To consider any business, which by reason of special circumstances, the Chair proposes to accept, under Section 100(b)(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972.
Decision: None Minutes: None |
|
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Please indicate if there are any interests which should be declared. A declaration of an interest should indicate the nature of the interest (if not already declared on the Register of Interests) and the agenda item to which it relates. If a disclosable pecuniary interest is declared, the member should withdraw from the room whilst the matter is discussed.
These declarations apply to all Members present, whether the Member is part of the meeting, attending to speak as a local Member on an item or simply observing the meeting from the public seating area. Decision: None Minutes: None |
|
CHAIR'S CORRESPONDENCE To receive any Chair’s correspondence. Decision: None Minutes: None |
|
MEMBERS PRESENT UNDER STANDING ORDER 34 To note the names of any Councillors who wish to address the meeting under Standing Order 34.
Members wishing to speak pursuant to Standing Order 34 should inform the Chair of their intention to do so and on what items they wish to be heard before a decision on that item is taken.
Decision: The following Councillors attended under standing order 34
C Morley – Items 9, 10, 11 A Kemp – Items 10, 11, 14 A Ryves – Item 10, 11, 12 C Joyce – Items 9, 10 T Parish – Items 9, 10 J Moriarty – Items 9, 10, 11 Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
The following Councillors attended under standing order 34
C Morley – Items CAB103, 104, 105 A Kemp – Items CAB104, 105, 107 A Ryves – Items CAB104, 105, 106 C Joyce – Items CAB103, 104 T Parish – Items CAB103, 104 J Moriarty – Items CAB103, 104, 105 |
|
CALLED IN MATTERS To report on any Cabinet Decisions called in. Decision: None Minutes: None |
|
A copy of the Forward Decisions List is attached
Decision: The forward decisions list was noted with the Procurement Strategy moved to much later in the year. Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
The forward decisions list was noted with the Procurement Strategy moved to much later in the year. |
|
MATTERS REFERRED TO CABINET FROM OTHER BODIES PDF 16 KB To receive any comments and recommendations from other Council bodies which meet after the dispatch of this agenda.
Decision: A meeting of the joint panels considered the budget, the recommendations were considered by Cabinet. Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
A meeting of the joint panels considered the budget, the recommendations were considered by Cabinet. |
|
MEMBERS ALLOWANCES INDEPENDENT REVIEW Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
Cabinet considered the Independent Remuneration Panel (IRP)’s report on the review of Members’ Allowances as presented by Councillor Dickinson. Cabinet Members had considered the report and were of the view that in the current financial climate it was not appropriate to make large changes to the scheme at this stage, but to continue with the current arrangements of linking with the pay increases awarded to staff.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Joyce addressed Cabinet on the hourly rate of remuneration, and against the removal of the Opposition Deputy Leader SRA proposed by the Independent Panel which would also decrease the number of allowances paid to opposition party members. He drew attention to the need for some councillors to be remunerated as they were not retired but were working with young families.
Under standing order 34, Councillor Parish drew attention to the Independent Panels recommendation for changes to the Opposition Leader and Deputy allowances. He suggested that the increases could be funded by being taken from other position’s allowances.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Moriarty endorsed the comments made by the Independent Panel and asked Cabinet to consider when the full review would take place.
Councillor Middleton commented that it was not the time to review the allowances fully when people were struggling. He drew attention to the number of hours worked by Cabinet members along with the responsibility placed upon them, when he was also working full time. He considered it should be looked at across the board and when it was time to make changes to do so together.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Morley drew attention to the fact that he and a number of other opposition members spent a lot of time on Council business.
Councillor Blunt agreed now was not the time to make a lot of changes and agreed that consideration had to be given to attracting people to stand for the Council.
Councillor Kunes confirmed he felt now was not the time to make many changes, but the issues needed to be addressed.
Councillor Dark acknowledged the delay in the report being prepared due to the additional workloads surrounding covid and thanked the Panel for the report. He referred to the volatile nature of the global and national financial situation. He referred to the 2.5% in the budget in line with staff rises which was the recommendation set out in the report which he supported, and acknowledged that now would not be the time to make sweeping changes to the system as working arrangements for councillors had changed considerably in recent times and it wasn’t known if they would be permanent.
Councillor Dickinson commented on the need to look in the round how councillors worked and the ability to attract candidates in the future. She responded regarding the hourly rate used which was the local rate set in Dec 2020, which had to be discounted by 20% to take into account the ... view the full minutes text for item CAB103 |
|
FINANCIAL PLAN 2021/26 PDF 2 MB Additional documents:
Decision: RECOMMENDED: 1) It is recommended that Council note the revision to the Forecast for 2021/2022 as set out in the report.
2) Council is recommended to approve the Policy on Earmarked Reserves and General Fund Balance and the maximum balances set for the reserves as noted in the report and at Appendix 7 in the report.
3) It is recommended that Council : i) Approves the budget of £21,550,170 for 2022/2023 and notes the projections for 2023/2024, 2024/2025 and 2025/2026. ii) Approves the level of Special Expenses for the Town/Parish Councils as detailed in the report. iii) Approves the Fees and Charges for 2022/2023 detailed in Appendix 4 of the report. iv) Approves a Band D council tax of £139.37 for 2022/2023
4) It is recommended that Council approves a minimum requirement of the General Fund balance for 2022/23 of £1,128,410.
Reason for decision
To set a budget for the coming financial year. Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
The S 151 Officer, Assistant Director - Resources presented the Financial Plan to Cabinet. It was noted that she had held briefings for Opposition political groups and held a Joint Panels meeting to scrutinise the budget.
In summary the figures shown in the Financial Plan for 2021/2026 included a £4.50 per annum per Band D dwelling increase in council tax for each year of the plan. The overall £5 increase permitted under the Council Tax Referendum Principles included the £4.50 per annum per Band D dwelling increase in council tax to cover the Borough expenditure and an increase of £0.50 per annum to cover the expenditure for special expenses.
The Financial Plan 2021/2026 did show that the Council could present a funded budget for three years but there was a budget gap in excess of £2m to address in 2025/2026. The current general fund balances would be required to support the budget in the event that income levels were not achieved and/or delayed, whilst further cost reductions are made.
The report explained that there remained significant uncertainty and risk from 2023/2024. As well as the impact from the pandemic on the council’s finances, the council still awaited confirmation of the outcome of the Funding and Business Rates reforms proposed by Government.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Morley sought assurance that the elements contained in the budget were being “sweated”. He drew attention to the potential risks in income and expenditure with minimal flexibility in the budget. He thanked the S151 Officer for her assistance with the papers.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Kemp suggested that Cabinet consider the setting up and investing in a renewable energy company to help residents with price rises and meet the gap in budget.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Joyce thanked the S151 Officer for her assistance. He made reference to the changes in Government funding to pay for the IDB levies whereby the Council now had to fund what had previously been funded by the Government. He mentioned the lack of Council Tax increases in earlier years which had impacted on the budget available now. He also made reference to employee costs and the fact that a number of staff in the planning department had left, suggesting an amendment may be brought forward to increase those costs as those staff were the budget earners.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Moriarty suggested that as he had not received answers to the list of questions he had raised that the Cabinet adjourn the meeting re-consider the content of the budget and reconvene as he considered it hadn’t been scrutinised.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Ryves commented on the level of reserves held by the authority. He also commented on the high level of reserves held by IDBs and drew attention to the fact that only a small number of District Councils had IDBs within their areas, so causing the large payments having to be ... view the full minutes text for item CAB104 |
|
CAPITAL STRATEGY 2022/23 PDF 709 KB Additional documents: Decision: RECOMMENDED: That the Capital Strategy 2022/2023 as attached to the report be approved.
Reason for Decision Not to approve these policies would contravene the requirements of both legislation and good practice. In addition, the external auditors may comment in their report to those charged with governance (ISA260). Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
Cabinet considered a report which set out the Capital Strategy which outlined the principles and framework that shaped the Council’s capital decisions. The principal aim was to deliver a programme of capital investment that contributed to the achievement of the Council’s priorities and objectives as set out in the Corporate Plan. The Capital Strategy would be updated annually and would be put before Cabinet alongside the Treasury Management Strategy so that it could be approved before the year to which it relates begins. The Strategy defined at the highest level how the capital programme was to be formulated; it identified the issues and options that influenced capital spending and set out how the resources and capital programme would be managed.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Moriarty pointed out that the joint panels were invited to read the Cabinet reports for their meeting on 9 February.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Morley expressed concern about the governance aspect of it, and the bureaucratic processes hindering projects being delivered on time. He expressed concern about eh number of schemes.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Kemp re-iterated her comments on the provision of an energy farm.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Ryves asked if the revenue implications of transferring housing into Companies had been considered.
Councillor Kunes commented that the council was looking into the possibility of investing in solar or turbines on a small scale, but would not be considering setting up an electricity supply company.
Councillor Blunt commented on the processes required by the Government for the schemes being applied for which had to be complied with.
RECOMMENDED: That the Capital Strategy 2022/2023 as attached to the report be approved.
Reason for Decision Not to approve these policies would contravene the requirements of both legislation and good practice. In addition, the external auditors may comment in their report to those charged with governance (ISA260). |
|
Decision: RECOMMENDED: 1) That the Treasury Management Strategy Statement 2022/2023, including treasury indicators for 2022-2026 be approved.
2) That the Minimum Revenue Provision Policy 2022/2023 be approved.
3) That the Investment Strategy 2022/2023 be approved.
Reason for the Decision The Council must have approved a Treasury Management Strategy Statement, Minimum Revenue Provision Policy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy 2022/2023 by 31 March 2022. Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
The Assistant Director presented the report which explained that the Council was required to receive and approve a Treasury Management Strategy Statement; Annual Investment Strategy; and Minimum Revenue Provision Policy Statement which covered: · The Treasury Management Strategy · Capital plans, including prudential indicators · A Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) Policy · An Investment Strategy
The report covered the requirements of the Local Government Act 2003, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance Accountants (CIPFA) Prudential Code, The Department of Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC - this was formerly the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)), MRP Guidance, the CIPFA Treasury Management Code and the DLUHC Investment Guidance. The Council’s Treasury Advisor, Link Asset Services, provided a template document for the Treasury Management Strategy Statement, which was fully compliant with CIPFA’s code and DLUHC’s guidance. The Council had used the template in preparing the report.
The report looked at the period 2021-2026, which fitted with the Council’s Financial Plan and Capital Programme. Officers of the council had prepared the report based on their views of forecasts for interest rates, and had used information provided by the council’s Treasury Management Advisor, Link Asset Services.
Under standing order 34 Councillor Ryves what strategy would be for the interest, to which it was explained that short term investments were made with no extended borrowing at the moment.
RECOMMENDED: 1) That the Treasury Management Strategy Statement 2022/2023, including treasury indicators for 2022-2026 be approved.
2) That the Minimum Revenue Provision Policy 2022/2023 be approved.
3) That the Investment Strategy 2022/2023 be approved.
Reason for the Decision The Council must have approved a Treasury Management Strategy Statement, Minimum Revenue Provision Policy Statement and Annual Investment Strategy 2022/2023 by 31 March 2022. |
|
CAPITAL PROGRAMME AND RESOURCES 2021-2026 PDF 1 MB Additional documents: Decision: RECOMMENDED: 1) That the amendments to capital schemes and resources for the 2021-2026 capital programme as detailed in the report be approved.
2) That new capital bids to be funded from available capital resources and included in the capital programme 2021-2026 as detailed in the report be approved.
Reason for Decision To report amendments, rephasing and resources to the 2021-2026 Capital Programme Minutes: Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube
Cabinet considered a report which: · revised the 2021/2022 projections for spending on the capital programme · set out an estimate of capital resources that would be available for 2021-2026 · detailed new capital bids that were recommended to be included in the capital programme for the period 2021-2026 · outlined provisional figures for capital expenditure for the period 2021-2026 · Exempt section detailed corporate capital projects
Under standing order 34 Councillor Kemp asked for the West Lynn Ferry to be included in the capital programme.
No debate was held on the exempt pages.
RECOMMENDED: 1) That the amendments to capital schemes and resources for the 2021-2026 capital programme as detailed in the report be approved.
2) That new capital bids to be funded from available capital resources and included in the capital programme 2021-2026 as detailed in the report be approved.
Reason for Decision To report amendments, rephasing and resources to the 2021-2026 Capital Programme |