Issue - meetings

RECOMMENDED:   1)       That Council approve the revision to the Budget for 2015/2016 as set out in the report.

2)       That the Policy on Earmarked Reserves and General Fund Working Balance and the maximum balances set for the reserves as noted in the report be re-affirmed.

3) That Council :

i) Approves the budget of £17,970,200 for 2016/2017 and notes the projections for 2017/2018, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020.

ii) Approves the level of Special Expenses for the Town/Parish Councils as detailed in the report.

iii) Approves the Fees and Charges 2016/2017 detailed in Appendix 4.

iv) Approves a Band D council tax of £112.87 for 2016/2017

v) Instructs Management Team to present the Council’s Efficiency Plan to Cabinet as soon as the Government guidance is published and that the Council takes up the option to ’fix’ the four year settlement referred to in paragraph 1.3 above.

4) That the minimum requirement of the General Fund balance for 2016/2017 of £932,756 be approved.

Reason for Decision

The Council is obliged to set a Budget Requirement and level of council tax before the beginning of a financial year commencing on 1 April

Councillor Daubney presented the financial Plan for 2015/2020 which projected the budget for a 5 year period in a climate of austerity.  He referred to earlier budgets where the anticipation was how much the Revenue   Support Grant (RSG) had increased, whereas now the budget was about how much the RSG had decreased and its phasing out.  The future for budgets entailed local taxation and business rates retention which would be key, the detail of which was still to come from the Government. Councillor Daubney explained that the key was to ensure the savings were found, and the risks mitigated, he considered the Council had a strong record of finding savings, although it would get harder. He further drew attention to the election pledge he had given that Council Tax wouldn’t rise above inflation, therefore in accordance with that undertaking, he was proposing a 0.8% (0.9% RPI as at September 2015) increase in Council Tax.  Attention was drawn to the detailed presentations given on the budget at the Panel meetings where the proposals had also been discussed in detail.  The Panels had supported the recommendations.

The Section 151 Officer informed Members that in the presentations to Panels detail had been given on the decreases in grant funding which had been included in the report.  She wished to thank all those involved in helping her produce the final document, which she considered was one of the riskiest which had been produced.

The Chief Executive re-iterated the point on risk, particularly as the anticipated business rate growth was volatile, notably the number of appeals which were held in the backlog held by the Valuation Office.  He also expressed concern about the potential network impact of active lobbying by the County Councils which was arguing that the provisional settlements to Government should bring forward the transfer of funds from New Homes Bonus into the health and care elements of County budgets.  If that were to happen, District Councils would suffer the severe consequences financially.  He undertook to get on with finding the savings required, some of which would be through efficiencies, some increased income and others a reduction in services provided.

Councillor Beales sought further clarification on the Valuation appeals and whether the concern and the money set aside in the budget related to the 2010 power station ruling, or those appeals being made by the NHS.  The S151 Officer responded that any business could appeal their business rates, the budget still held the potential amount awardable should the ruling on the 2010 power station appeal be made during the financial year.  If the decision on that did not award the relief, that budget would then be available for the Council to use.  Different information had been forthcoming recently from the Valuation office which at the beginning of the year had supplied information that no more appeals could be backdated.  However since that time  the Valuation Office had given information on a raft of appeals which they had yet to deal with which would  ...  view the full minutes text for item 124