Agenda item

Minute extracts will follow

 

 

CAB104: West Winch Growth Area Masterplan

CAB105: Council Tax Support Scheme 2023/24 (Including Nom 11/22)

CAB107: Parkway Development Update

 

 

Minutes:

Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube

 

Councillor Dark, with Councillor Middleton seconding, proposed the recommendations from the Cabinet meeting on 17 January 2023:

 

CAB104: West Winch Growth Area Masterplan

 

Council debated the recommendations with comments made on the lack of infrastructure being provided prior to any development being built, issues around transport,  drainage and the deferral of the recommendations until the current Local Plan Examination had re-convened. 


Council’s attention was drawn to the fact that the West Winch proposals had been dealt with at the previous Local Plan Examination and were not affected by the current one.

 

Councillor Moriarty proposed an amendment: that the final decision on the West Winch Supplementary Planning Document be deferred until after the Local Plan Examination was reconvened. This was seconded by Councillor Kemp.

 

Councillor Dark did not accept the amendment. 

 

Members debated the amendment, and on being put to the vote the amendment was lost 23 For, 24 Against and 1 Abstention.

 

Council then debated the substantive motion.  At the request of the required number of members a recorded vote was taken on the substantive motion.

 

For

Against

Abstain

Ayres

Bhondi

Morley

Bambridge

Bone

 

Blunt

Bullen

 

Bower

Collop

 

Bubb

Holmes

 

Collingham

Howland

 

Crofts

Howman

 

Dark

Hudson

 

Devereux

Jones

 

Dickinson

Joyce

 

Gidney

Kemp

 

Hipperson

Lawton

 

Humphrey

Lowe

 

Kirk

Moriarty

 

Kunes

Nash

 

Lawrence

Parish

 

Long

Rust

 

Manning

Ryves

 

Middleton

Squire

 

Nockolds

A Tyler

 

Rose

Ware

 

Sampson

De Whalley

 

Sandell

Wilkinson

 

D Tyler

 

 

24

23

1

 

Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube

 

Council considered CAB105: Council Tax Support Scheme 2023/24 (Including Nom 11/22).   Councillor Jones, seconded by Councillor Hudson proposed the amendment that the Council Tax support Scheme for 2023-24 be set at 100%.

 

Councillor Dark did not accept the amendment.

 

Council debated the amendment, which Councillor Jones recommended be paid for from savings in grass cutting on behalf of the County Council and changes to where money was invested. 

 

Council debated the amendment, and with the required number of members a recorded vote was taken.

 

For

Against

Abstain

Bhondi

Ayres

 

Bone

Bambridge

 

Bullen

Blunt

 

Collop

Bower

 

Holmes

Bubb

 

Howland

Collingham

 

Howman

Crofts

 

Howland

Dark

 

Hudson

Devereux

 

Jones

Dickinson

 

Joyce

Gidney

 

Kemp

Hipperson

 

Lawton

Humphrey

 

Lowe

Kirk

 

Moriarty

Kunes

 

Morley

Lawrence

 

Nash

Long

 

Parish

Manning

 

Rust

Middleton

 

Ryves

Nockolds

 

Squire

Rose

 

A Tyler

Sampson

 

De Whalley

Sandell

 

Wilkinson

D Tyler

 

 

Whitby

 

23

25

0

 

Council then debated the substantive motion which was put to the vote and approved 29 for, 14 against, 2 abstain.

 

At 18.12, Council adjourned to 18.22.

 

Click here to view the recording of this item on You Tube

 

Council debated CAB107: Parkway Development Update, commenting on the risks of the scheme, its costs, the question of the benefit to the community, air quality. The large numbers on the housing lists were highlighted, along with the green elements to the construction of the properties.

 

Councillor Squire proposed an amendment that recommendation 4 be replaced with: “the future management arrangements for the proposed wildlife and environment site to the east of the development be referred to the Environment and Community Panel for full discussion.”  The amendment was seconded by Councillor Moriarty.

 

Councillor Dark did not accept the amendment.  On being put to the vote, the amendment was lost 20 For, 25 Against 2 Abstain.

 

Council then debated the substantive motion with points raised that more affordable housing was needed, flood risk on the site, and the earlier history to the site and support received for the reduction in its size in 2021 and its green credentials with the wildlife site next to the site.

 

On being put to the vote the substantive motion was carried: 27 For, 15 Against, 4 Abstain.

 

RESOLVED:  That the recommendations from the 17 January 2023 Cabinet meeting be approved.

Supporting documents: