To discuss the outcomes of the meetings with the Custom Build enablers.
Minutes:
Members received a presentation from officers which provided an overview of meetings held with five custom and self-build enablers and the different options which could be taken forward on Council owned sites, namely the site at Stoke Ferry.
The Task Group discussed the following:
· The pros and cons of the different methods of delivering custom and self-build on sites and the different roles of the enablers.
· The risks associated with each option and how these could be mitigated.
· How the Council could retain control and ensure that a quality build was delivered.
· There had been progress on how custom and self builds could be mortgaged and the enablers could assist with this.
· The different levels of assistance which could be provided to individuals, for example they could be guided through the whole process by the enabler, or do it all themselves.
· Legal agreements could include the requirement to complete the build within two years. This would be achievable as plots would already have services installed.
The Task Group was informed that officers had met with the following five custom and self-build enablers, all who provided different levels of assistance:
· Pottons
· Custom Build Homes (part of Build Store)
· Lived in Custom Build (who were currently involved in the Ingoldisthorpe site)
· C Zero
· Steenvlider
Officers explained that the next stage would be to better understand demand for the Stoke Ferry site and this was something which could be provided by Custom Build Homes. It was acknowledged that a general Borough wide demand assessment had been carried out previously, but it was necessary to produce one for the specific site. It was anticipated that this assessment could be carried out fairly quickly and would assist in deciding which type of enabling method was used when taking development of the site forward.
Once the demand assessment had been carried out the Task Group could discuss which options they felt would be best to apply to the site and then make a recommendation to the Regeneration and Development Panel for consideration.
The Chair also suggested that the Task Group be provided with the opportunity to meet with Pottons and officers agreed to arrange this.
The Task Group was provided with the following information on the Stoke Ferry Site:
· Outline planning permission had been granted for part of the site, which was an allocated site. However a new application would be submitted.
· It was likely that the site would be developed in two phases as one half of the site was already allocated and the second half was included in the draft Local Plan.
· Each phase would consist of approximately ten plots and an affordable housing contribution would be required.
The Task Group was also informed that there was a second council owned site which could now be considered for custom and self-build. The Task Group was provided with details of a site at Sedgeford and it was explained that by taking forward two different sites, the Council would have the opportunity to explore different enabling methods.
AGREED:
1. Officers to arrange for the demand assessment for the Stoke Ferry site to be carried out.
2. Officers to arrange for the Task Group to receive a presentation from Pottons.
3. Officers to investigate the opportunities for the Sedgeford site and present to the Task Group at their next meeting.